Please view the main text area of the page by skipping the main menu.

Top court overturns decision that nixed return of child to US

TOKYO (Kyodo) -- The Supreme Court overturned on Thursday a lower court ruling that sided with a mother who brought her 13-year-old son to Japan from the United States and turned down the father's request to return the child.

    The top court made the first decision on cases in which the return of a child has yet to take place despite a finalized Japanese court order to take the child back based on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

    The Supreme Court's First Petty Branch said it sees "clear illegality" in the mother's failure to comply with the order and sent the case back to the Nagoya High Court's Kanazawa branch for further deliberation.

    The parents are both Japanese. A cross-border child custody battle began after the mother left their residence in the United States and returned to Japan with their second son in 2016.

    Last November, the high court branch rejected the father's plea to take the son back to his former habitual residence in accordance with the Hague Convention, citing the child's wish to continue to live in Japan.

    The treaty sets out rules and procedures for the prompt return to the country of habitual residence of children under 16 taken or retained by one parent as a result of failed marriages, if requested by the other parent.

    The pact stipulates that if a parent takes a child to another member state, a judgment as to which one of the parents is to take care for the child should be made in principle after returning the child to the country of his or her former habitual residence. Japan joined the convention in 2014.

    Based on the treaty, the Tokyo Family Court ordered the mother to return the son to the United States and it was finalized in November 2016. But when enforcement officers visited the home of the mother and the child in Japan, the mother refused to let him go.

    The situation prompted the father to file a habeas corpus appeal with the Nagoya High Court's Kanazawa branch, but it rejected his claim, saying, "Custody transfer is against the son's will and the Hague Convention does not influence judgment on a habeas corpus petition."

    At the top court, the mother has argued the son wishes to stay in Japan and lawyers representing the son have submitted a similar written statement.


    The Mainichi on social media